Home
|
Contact Us
|
Partnership
|
Site Map
CheckOrphan
Home
Treatment
Research
People
Events
Team
Advisory Board
Sponsorship
BioEnergy
Home
News
Events
About Us
Sponsorship
GreenBio
Home
News
Events
Organizations
Companies
Research
About Us
Sponsorship
BioBasel
Home
News
Events
About Us
Sponsorship
Checkbiotech - for emerging fields of science
NEWSLETTERS
SUBMIT CONTENT
Checkbiotech Home
Sign In
|
Register
View
Edit
Domain:
BioEnergy
Title:
*
Body:
A new generation of biofuels, meant to be a low-carbon alternative, will on average emit more carbon dioxide than burning gasoline over the next few decades, a study published in Science has found.<br /> <br /> Governments and companies are pouring billions of research dollars into advanced fuels made from wood and grass, meant to cut carbon emissions compared with gasoline, and not compete with food as corn-based biofuels do now.<br /> <br /> But such advanced, “cellulosic” biofuels will actually lead to higher carbon emissions than gasoline per unit of energy, averaged over the 2000-2030 time period, the study found. That is because the land required to plant fast-growing poplar trees and tropical grasses would displace food crops, and so drive deforestation to create more farmland, a powerful source of carbon emissions.<br /> <br /> Biofuel crops also require nitrogen fertilisers, a source of two greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2) and the more powerful nitrous oxide. “In the near-term I think, irrespective of how you go about the cellulosic biofuels programme, you’re going to have greenhouse gas emissions exacerbating the climate change problem,” said lead author, Jerry Melillo, from the US Marine Biological Laboratory.<br /> <br /> US ethanol industry group the Renewable Fuels Association said biofuels are by definition emissions neutral because their tailpipe carbon output is absorbed by growing plants. Without steps to protect forests and cut fertiliser use, gasoline out-performs biofuels from 2000-2050 as well.<br /> <br /> The paper did not mean cellulosic biofuels had no place. “It is not an obvious and easy win without thinking very carefully about the problem,” said Melillo. “We have to think very carefully about both short and long-term consequences.” A related study, also published in the journal Science on Thursday, said the United Nations had exaggerated carbon savings from biofuels and biomass, in a mistake copied by the European Union in its cap and trade law, by ignoring deforestation and other land use changes.<br /> <br /> The mistake was carried into US climate legislation as well, and would worsen as governments put a price on carbon, driving more biofuel use, it said. “There will be increasing pressure to convert the biomass of the world into an energy source,” said Steve Hamburg, chief scientist at green group the Environmental Defense Fund and co-author of the second Science paper.<br /> <br /> “Then it competes with agriculture, water protection, biodiversity, a whole host of things, and that doesn’t provide benefits to the atmosphere,” he told Reuters. It was also important to take account of how the land had been managed before it was grown with biofuels, said Hamburg. A previous farming practice may have been better for the planet, he said, underlining the complexity of calculating benefits. Advocates hope that forthcoming talks to agree a new global climate deal in Copenhagen in December will protect forests, by rewarding land owners to store carbon in their trees.<br /> <br /> The first paper did not explicitly consider the food production impact of ramping up advanced biofuels. The UN’s food agency says that global food output will have to increase 70 per cent by 2050 to feed a growing, more affluent population. The world’s forests, rather than farmland, would have to make way for biofuels which would consume by 2,100 more land than all food crops now, the first study found. “We think there is space on earth for both food crops and the biofuels but there are consequences of using that space,” in lost forest, Melillo said.<br />
Captcha:
Please Enter Code :
*
Time Zone:
*
(UTC -12:00) Eniwetok, Kwajalein
(UTC -11:00) Midway Island, Samoa
(UTC -10:00) Hawaii
(UTC -9:00) Alaska
(UTC -8:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
(UTC -7:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
(UTC -6:00) Central Time (US & Canada), Mexico City
(UTC -5:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada), Bogota, Lima
(UTC -4:00) Atlantic Time (Canada), Caracas, La Paz
(UTC -3:30) Newfoundland
(UTC -3:00) Brazil, Buenos Aires, Georgetown
(UTC -2:00) Mid-Atlantic
(UTC -1:00 hour) Azores, Cape Verde Islands
(UTC) Western Europe Time, London, Lisbon, Casablanca
(UTC +1:00 hour) Brussels, Madrid, Paris, Zurich
(UTC +2:00) Kaliningrad, South Africa
(UTC +3:00) Baghdad, Riyadh, Moscow, St. Petersburg
(UTC +3:30) Tehran
(UTC +4:00) Abu Dhabi, Muscat, Baku, Tbilisi
(UTC +4:30) Kabul
(UTC +5:00) Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent
(UTC +5:30) Bombay, Calcutta, Madras, New Delhi
(UTC +5:45) Kathmandu
(UTC +6:00) Almaty, Dhaka, Colombo
(UTC +7:00) Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta
(UTC +8:00) Beijing, Perth, Singapore, Hong Kong
(UTC +9:00) Tokyo, Seoul, Osaka, Sapporo, Yakutsk
(UTC +9:30) Adelaide, Darwin
(UTC +10:00) Eastern Australia, Guam, Vladivostok
(UTC +11:00) Magadan, Solomon Islands, New Caledonia
(UTC +12:00) Auckland, Wellington, Fiji, Kamchatka
Select the time zone
Vocabularies
Newsletter:
- None selected -
checkorphan.com newsletter
Domain:
BioEnergy
Show summary in full view
Input format
Filtered HTML
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Full HTML
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
news_filter
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
More information about formatting options
Related Articles
ADM to close ND ethanol plant
Transportation fuels of the future: using left-overs from fo...
USDA Announces Funding for Two Renewable Energy Programs
US Navy issues 450K gallon RFP for advanced biofuels
Biofuels worse for climate change than fossil fuels
Hole-y cow! Guts could lead to holy grail for cheap biofuels
Alcohol industry wants say on ethanol pricing
Ag Secretary Vilsack to keynote cellulosic biofuels summit
Biofuel support, farm subsidies may face battle in new House
EPA lowers next year's target for cellulosic biofuels
Top BioEnergy Articles
Home
|
Partnership
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
News Site Map
© 2000-2012 Checkbiotech.org |
Disclaimer