Europe fails to endorse milk and meat from clones | Checkbiotech

Home | Contact Us | Partnership | Site Map

left shadow

Checkbiotech - for emerging fields of science

NEWSLETTERS SUBMIT CONTENT

Checkbiotech Home

Sign In | Register

bottom shadow


	View Edit Domain: GreenBio Title: * Body: BRUSSELS, Belgium - The European Food Safety Authority pulled back on Thursday from giving milk and meat from cloned animals a clean bill of health, making it less likely that such products could reach store shelves in Europe anytime soon.The final report from the authority, an independent advisory body, was less reassuring about safety than a draft in January. An earlier assessment by a European ethics committee was negative.<br /><br />The European Commission, which must decide whether to approve such products, will take both reports into account.<br /><br />The findings also contrast with those of the United States Food and Drug Administration, which concluded this year that such products were safe - although a voluntary moratorium on marketing them remains in place.<br /><br />Europeans seem likely to take an even more cautious approach, similar to that followed with genetically modified crops - which has led to years of trade friction with the United States. Surveys show resistance in Europe to biotechnology remains high, especially when it comes to food.<br /><br />While cloning animals is still a young and inefficient technology, scientists expect it to improve. In theory, the procedure can produce meatier cows or pigs that are better able to resist diseases.<br /><br />But in its statement Thursday, the authority said that "uncertainties in the risk assessment arise due to the limited number of studies available, the small sample sizes investigated and, in general, the absence of a uniform approach that would allow all the issues relevant to this opinion to be more satisfactorily addressed."<br /><br />Some of the same points were mentioned in the draft report, but they were given less weight.<br /><br />A spokeswoman for the authority, Karen Talbot, acknowledged that there was a change of emphasis in the new findings, which followed months of consultations with industry bodies, trade and farming associations, consumer groups and nongovernmental organizations.<br /><br />"The conclusions are not fundamentally different," she said, "but, after the consultation, they have acknowledged more clearly what they do know and what they don`t know."<br /><br />The chairman of the authority`s scientific committee, Vittorio Silano, said that for cattle and pigs, food safety concerns were "unlikely." But, he added, "the evidence base, while growing and showing consistent findings, is still small."<br /><br />The opinion Thursday is one of three pieces of advice that will be considered by the commission, which would have to give authorization for food from cloned animals to be marketed within the 27-nation European Union.<br /><br />Another opinion emerged in January in a report by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies.<br /><br />It said that there were "doubts as to whether cloning animals for food supply is ethically justified."<br /><br />It added that it did "not see convincing arguments to justify the production of food from clones and their offspring."<br /><br />The food safety authority`s report Thursday also noted health and animal welfare problems associated with cloning. In practice, the process produces a relatively high proportion of deformed animals that cannot survive, although such rates will probably decline as the technology improves.<br /><br />The third element to be considered by the commission is an opinion survey, which is expected to be available in the fall.<br /><br />"We are gathering the pieces of the puzzle. Then we will consult with the member states, stakeholders and the European Parliament," a European Commission spokeswoman on health issues, Nina Papadoulaki, said.<br /><br />During its consultation process, which began after the draft report was released, the food safety authority said that it had received 285 submissions from 64 interested parties, including individuals, organizations and national risk-assessment bodies.<br /><br />In a statement issued after a Feb. 7 meeting, the panel noted that the main issue "was the strength of the evidence base on which to reach conclusions."<br /><br />"A related point made by a number of participants was the need for ongoing research into cloning," it added.<br /><br />In January, the F.D.A. concluded that meat and milk from clones of cattle, swine and goats were as safe to eat as food from conventionally bred animals. It asked the cloning industry to adhere to a voluntary moratorium on putting cloned products into the food chain to prepare for a smooth transition.<br /><br />The European Commission said the latest opinion pointed to unresolved issues.<br /><br />"The very preliminary reaction to this report is that it gives rise to increased concerns on aspects of animal of animal health and welfare," it said. It said that because of the absence of data, there were some open questions on food safety.<br /><br /><br />©Ã‚Â 2008 The New York Times Company Captcha: Please Enter Code : * Time Zone: * Select the time zone Vocabularies Newsletter: Domain: Show summary in full view Input format Filtered HTML Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically. Lines and paragraphs break automatically. Full HTML Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically. Lines and paragraphs break automatically. news_filter Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically. More information about formatting options			Related Articles German farm group regrets BASF’s GMO move to U.S. BASF to Stop Selling Genetically Modified Products in Europe French GMO crops unlikely in 2012 despite end of ban Approvals of GMOs in the European Union Poland - Monsanto Vegetables Seeds' Tomato and Rootstock Con... Nanofoods - coming to a plate near you? Biotech firms warn EU over pace of GM crop approvals Flax industry sees "good progress" against Triffid Sembiosys and Tasly Pharmaceuticals Sign Multi-Product Comme... Court rulings re-ignite debate on GM crops Top GreenBio Articles

Home | Partnership | Contact Us | Site Map | News Site Map
© 2000-2012 Checkbiotech.org | Disclaimer