Home
|
Contact Us
|
Partnership
|
Site Map
CheckOrphan
Home
Treatment
Research
People
Events
Team
Advisory Board
Sponsorship
BioEnergy
Home
News
Events
About Us
Sponsorship
GreenBio
Home
News
Events
Organizations
Companies
Research
About Us
Sponsorship
BioBasel
Home
News
Events
About Us
Sponsorship
Checkbiotech - for emerging fields of science
NEWSLETTERS
SUBMIT CONTENT
Checkbiotech Home
Sign In
|
Register
View
Edit
Domain:
GreenBio
Title:
*
Body:
Europe is poised for a fresh battle over genetically modified crops as its top regulator moves to relax a zerotolerance policy on unauthorised GM imports.Androulla Vassiliou, health commissioner, is set to recommend lifting the threshold for GM "contamination" in response to pressure from farmers and the food industry, which claim they are spending millions of pounds finding alternatives. <br /><br />Environmental campaigners, however, say warnings that the EU could be unable to find supplies are scaremongering. Diplomatic sources in Brazil and Argentina, which supply almost all the EU`s animal feed supplies and soya for processed food, also question the apocalyptic scenario. <br /><br />"We produce to satisfy our clients. We are not going to produce something they are not going to buy," said a Brazilian source. <br /><br />Ms Vassiliou is likely to propose lifting the threshold from zero to 0.1 per cent. That would cover most of the recent contamination cases, such as the LL601 incident in 2006 when genetically modified rice came into the EU from the US and had to be withdrawn from the market, costing companies involved millions of euros. <br /><br />The change would not require new legislation and the subsequent support of a qualified majority of EU ministers and the European parliament. Ms Vassiliou`s spokeswoman said that experts from member states, however, would have to agree the policy change. <br /><br />"We are looking at a technical solution that would not require changing the law," the spokeswoman said. It is the least radical option called for. The food industry had pushed for 0.9 per cent, in line with the amount of GM allowed in foodstuffs without having to be labelled. The US wants 5 per cent. <br /><br />EU citizens and their governments are broadly hostile to GM. It can take up to four years to approve a new product even for animal feed imports, the most uncontroversial area. In the US, by contrast, the process takes a few months so there are many more approved crops. <br /><br />With the EU dependent on imports for 77 per cent of its animal feed, farmers are left paying about 10 per cent more for supplies than rivals, and trade is occasionally disrupted when an unauthorised genetically modified organism is found. <br /><br />Friends of the Earth, the environmental pressure group, has condemned the commissioner`s plan. <br /><br />"If the EU was serious about listening to its citizens it would not be quietly weakening GMO laws behind closed doors," said Helen Holder, European GM campaigner at the organisation. <br /><br />"The EU is falling for the biotech industry`s pro-GM hype. European livestock farmers need real solutions not measures that will simply increase the industry`s control and profits." <br /><br />The EU has approved about 20 GM substances for imports. Brazilian and Argentine sources say the change would be aimed more at cutting costs than ensuring supply.<br /><br /><br />© The Financial Times Limited 2008
Captcha:
Please Enter Code :
*
Time Zone:
*
(UTC -12:00) Eniwetok, Kwajalein
(UTC -11:00) Midway Island, Samoa
(UTC -10:00) Hawaii
(UTC -9:00) Alaska
(UTC -8:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
(UTC -7:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
(UTC -6:00) Central Time (US & Canada), Mexico City
(UTC -5:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada), Bogota, Lima
(UTC -4:00) Atlantic Time (Canada), Caracas, La Paz
(UTC -3:30) Newfoundland
(UTC -3:00) Brazil, Buenos Aires, Georgetown
(UTC -2:00) Mid-Atlantic
(UTC -1:00 hour) Azores, Cape Verde Islands
(UTC) Western Europe Time, London, Lisbon, Casablanca
(UTC +1:00 hour) Brussels, Madrid, Paris, Zurich
(UTC +2:00) Kaliningrad, South Africa
(UTC +3:00) Baghdad, Riyadh, Moscow, St. Petersburg
(UTC +3:30) Tehran
(UTC +4:00) Abu Dhabi, Muscat, Baku, Tbilisi
(UTC +4:30) Kabul
(UTC +5:00) Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent
(UTC +5:30) Bombay, Calcutta, Madras, New Delhi
(UTC +5:45) Kathmandu
(UTC +6:00) Almaty, Dhaka, Colombo
(UTC +7:00) Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta
(UTC +8:00) Beijing, Perth, Singapore, Hong Kong
(UTC +9:00) Tokyo, Seoul, Osaka, Sapporo, Yakutsk
(UTC +9:30) Adelaide, Darwin
(UTC +10:00) Eastern Australia, Guam, Vladivostok
(UTC +11:00) Magadan, Solomon Islands, New Caledonia
(UTC +12:00) Auckland, Wellington, Fiji, Kamchatka
Select the time zone
Vocabularies
Newsletter:
- None selected -
checkorphan.com newsletter
Domain:
GreenBio
Show summary in full view
Input format
Filtered HTML
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Full HTML
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
news_filter
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
More information about formatting options
Related Articles
German farm group regrets BASF’s GMO move to U.S.
BASF to Stop Selling Genetically Modified Products in Europe
French GMO crops unlikely in 2012 despite end of ban
Approvals of GMOs in the European Union
Poland - Monsanto Vegetables Seeds' Tomato and Rootstock Con...
Nanofoods - coming to a plate near you?
Biotech firms warn EU over pace of GM crop approvals
Flax industry sees "good progress" against Triffid
Sembiosys and Tasly Pharmaceuticals Sign Multi-Product Comme...
Court rulings re-ignite debate on GM crops
Top GreenBio Articles
Home
|
Partnership
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
News Site Map
© 2000-2012 Checkbiotech.org |
Disclaimer